Australia’s smallest baby is a living miracle

IF all had gone to plan, Elora De Bondi would have celebrated her first birthday days ago.

Instead, the gutsy Melbourne toddler – born almost four months premature and weighing only 319g – reached that milestone in January.

Ever since doctors told mother Adele her only child had “no chance of being born alive”, Elora has been a medical marvel.

Australia’s smallest surviving baby, Elora now tips the scales at 6.5kg and is charging ahead.

A thin feeding tube – and her place in the record books – are the only obvious clues to the 16-month-old’s dramatic start.

She spent her first seven months in the Royal Women’s Hospital. But Elora is now happy and relatively healthy at home in Montmorency.

Once “as long as a ballpoint pen”, she now stretches to 69cm and is not far off taking her first steps.

“She’s a very active and happy girl and very content. She loves playing and crawls like a speeding bullet,” Ms De Bondi said.

Since Elora arrived by emergency caesarean on January 29 last year, she has suffered “almost everything under the sun”, Ms De Bondi said.

Elora survived renal failure, chronic lung disease and many staph infections. Eating and swallowing are difficult because “she’s had so many tubes put down her throat”.

The Royal Women’s Hospital clinical director of nurseries, Sue Jacobs, said it was difficult to predict the quality of life for premature babies.

“Elora’s a bubbly, smiley and happy baby and that’s fabulous, but there’s still a lot of uncertainty about how she will be in the long term,” she said.

Ms De Bondi, 29, is now committed to supporting those who helped save her daughter, including the Royal Women’s Hospital Foundation and Life’s Little Treasures, a support group for Victorian families with premature babies.

To make a donation to the Women’s Foundation or Life’s Little Treasures, visit www.the womens.org.au and www.lifeslittletreasures.org.au.

Editor – Evonne Barry
Article from Herald Sun

Luke Shah’s a hero as scientists understand the premature brain

LUKE Shah is only five, but he’s set to help thousands of premature babies.

Born almost three months early, Luke is one of 138 Victorian children whose brains were scanned as newborns as part of a world-first study.

Six years into the project, researchers from Melbourne’s Howard Florey Institute are now sending their subjects, including Luke, back to the scanner.

The long-term aim is to match brain abnormalities in premature babies with the problems they typically face later in life – and then prevent them.

Scientist Deanne Thompson, who presented the study at last week’s international Human Brain Mapping conference in Melbourne, said the key was in monitoring the “white matter” that links the two sides of the brain.

“Premature infants have a reduced connection between the two hemispheres and often have difficulties with thinking, reasoning, problem solving and language,” she said.

“So if we can identify that a baby is likely to have certain learning difficulties, for example (by looking at their brain scan), treatments such as speech therapy can be targeted to them early.”

Editor – Evonne Barry, Health reporter

Article from Herald Sun 

Outcry over intensive care shortage for babies

THE state’s most fragile newborns are being sent interstate because Victoria’s neonatal intensive care units are stretched to breaking point.

Over the past week, Victoria’s 72 neonatal intensive care cots have been full, forcing dangerously premature babies or mothers with high-risk pregnancies to be flown interstate for life-preserving care.

Four acute babies or mothers with high-risk pregnancies have been flown to Canberra or Adelaide in the past fortnight.
At the same time, the Brumby Government celebrated the opening of the new $250 million Royal Women’s Hospital, which has been widely criticised for being too small to cope with a rising birthrate.

The Department of Human Services yesterday revealed that 12 newborns from regional areas, who would normally be treated at Melbourne hospitals, had been flown interstate for care in the past year.

This was up from just three in 2005-06 and nine in 2006-07.

The new Royal Women’s is equipped with 18 neonatal intensive care cots but can accommodate an extra two when stretched — the same as the hospital it replaced.

Newborn Emergency Transport Service state medical director Dr Michael Stewart said the system was under pressure from a surge in demand.

He said no babies had been harmed by the recent journeys.

“It is obviously not ideal to have to do this, but we are looking at what is the safest and most effective for the whole system at the time as well as being very cognisant of the individual baby and their families,” he said.

“I don’t think in the ideal world it is good to move an adult, a child or a baby from one hospital to another or out of the state if they need intensive care, but the reality is that is occasionally what we need to do.

“These peaks can last for a few days to a week or so, sometimes they last several months, but the tip of the peak we hope just lasts for several days because that does get very difficult to manage.”

The new $1 billion Royal Children’s Hospital will have an increase in its number of neonatal intensive care cots when it is completed in 2011.

Monash Medical Centre and Mercy Hospital for Women are the only other Victorian hospitals with units to sustain the dangerously premature newborns who need help to breath.

Dr Stewart said the state usually coped with less than 60 babies needing intensive care at any one time and “cot-block” had improved since 2000 when there were just 48 Victorian neonatal intensive care unit cots.

But Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists president Christine Tippett said there were simply not enough neonatal intensive care cots to meet demand.

“The four units are constantly running at or near capacity and the pressure on staff and equipment is at an unsustainable level,” she said.

Department of Human Services spokesman Steve Pivetta said babies in border areas were often closer to interstate hospitals and denied a lack of resources was to blame.

Editor – Grant McArthur
Article from Herald Sun

premature baby born 3 months early

MILICA shouldn’t be here yet. This five-week-old baby, born three months’ premature, should still be a kick in her mother’s belly and a half-decided name. Now her home is a plastic tub, a mess of monitor wires and a tube pressing air into her lungs.

Next Saturday she’ll have her second unexpected change of address, as one of the first babies to move from the old to the new Royal Women’s Hospital, which was officially opened yesterday. A team of specially trained paramedics will carefully lift her from her cot in the crowded intensive-care nursery of the dark and ageing Carlton premises.

Strapped to mobile life-support machines, the tiny 862-gram package (already 300 grams heavier than when she was born) will move three blocks down the road to the $250 million Parkville building, with its bright, spacious wards. There she will continue her fight towards independence.

Compared with Milica’s story so far, the move will be a walk in the park. Twelve years ago her mother, Fiona Nika, 36, of Hillside, was told she could not have children. She and husband Branko accepted it. “We raised dogs and so forth.”

Then, two weeks before Christmas, they were told they were expecting a child. That shock was enough. But five months later Mrs Nika woke in pain and the local hospital diagnosed severe pre-eclampsia.

Within hours she was at the Royal Women’s, being told her 26-week baby would have to enter the world in order to save both their lives. Doctors kept Milica inside Mrs Nika as long as possible: when a baby is this premature, every extra day in the womb adds to their chance of survival. But Mrs Nika’s condition worsened and Milica started to struggle. “It was touch and go for both of us,” Mrs Nika says.

Her husband remembers Milica being taken out. “There was no noise at all,” he says. She wasn’t breathing. Doctors forced air into her throat. For a moment, she started breathing and gave a tiny squeal. “That was the first time I thought she was going to make it.”

Groggy from the caesarean, Mrs Nika caught a glimpse of her daughter as she rushed past to intensive care. “I just saw this shape — ‘Oh, she looks pretty’ — then they took her.”

Mrs Nika says next weekend’s move will be one of the longest days of her life, as she waits to hear that her “little miracle girl” is safely at Parkville. “It will be the longest time I haven’t seen her … Come 6 o’clock (when parents are allowed into the new hospital) I’ll be kicking the door down.”

Article from the age

Premature girls get more from breast milk

Premature baby girls appear to get greater benefit from breastfeeding compared than premature baby boys, according to new research.

Researchers from Johns Hopkins University in the United States tracked a group of premature infants in Argentina to gauge the protective effect of breastfeeding against respiratory infections in babies.

The results of their research are published in this month’s edition of Pediatrics.

They found that infant girls who were breastfed were far less likely than baby boys who were breastfed to develop serious respiratory infections requiring hospitalisation.

Previous research has shown that breastfed babies receive a range of health benefits compared to those given baby formula.

These range from combating respiratory infections, fewer ear, stomach or intestinal infections, digestive problems, skin diseases and allergies.

“There are many, many different diseases that are protected against by breast-feeding. It’s a great source of nutrition,” Dr Fernando Polack of Johns Hopkins University says.

“In the specific case of acute respiratory diseases like bronchiolitis and viral infections of the respiratory tract, it seems that there is greater benefit in girls than in boys. And that benefit is substantial.”

Breathing easier

Bronchiolitis is an infection of the airways of the lungs seen most often in infants between about 3 and 6 months old.

The researchers studied a group of 119 high-risk infants who weighed under about 1.5 kilograms at delivery. This population is highly susceptible to these kinds of infections, Polack says.

Fifty per cent of the baby girls who were formula-fed had to be hospitalised when they experienced their first respiratory infection, compared to about 7 per cent of the girls who were breastfed, the researchers write.

There was no difference between the boys who were breastfed or formula-fed, with about 19 per cent of both groups needing hospitalisation when they got their first respiratory infection, the researchers said.

The pattern repeated throughout the first year of life and in subsequent infections, the researchers say.

Polack said there may be something in the breast milk that better activates a baby girl’s ability to cope with such infections more so than it does for a baby boy.

Article from ABC Science 

Premature Babies Need Cuddles

Cuddling up against their mother’s bare skin can help babies born as early as 28 weeks recover more quickly from the painful medical procedures, a new research suggests.

According to the Canadian study, very premature babies benefit from skin to skin contact with their parents. Writing in the journal BMC Pediatrics, the McGill University team said it might aid the recovery process.

This study is the first to look at extremely premature babies, born between 28 and 31 weeks. It was previously thought by some experts that such young babies were not developed enough to benefit from human touch.

A common test used in neonatal units is the “heel prick” blood test, which produces a sample, which can be used to check blood sugar levels. premature baby, NICU, pre-term, premmie, premature birth

This is inevitably painfill for the baby, and in some cases, it can take minutes for this distress to recede which could be a problem for a baby whose health is in the balance.

In the study researchers carried out the test on some babies who were being actively cuddled, skin-to-skin, measuring facial expressions, heart rate and blood oxygen levels to assess the amount of pain suffered.

Pain scores after 90 seconds for the cuddled babies were much lower than for those who were not cuddled. Half the cuddled babies did not show any facial expression of pain when undergoing a heel prick test. Lead researcher Celeste Johnston said that the shorter recovery time could help maintain the baby’s health.

“The pain response in very preterm neonates appears to be reduced by skin-to-skin maternal contact,” BBC quoted her, as saying. Professor Linda Franck, from the Institute of Child Health in London, said that parents were often not encouraged to have skin-to-skin contact with their premature babies in UK neonatal units, despite growing evidence that it could help.

She said: “Neonatal units can be very intimidating places, and parents often do not know the best way to get involved. Parents want to do the right thing, but the message is difficult to get out there.”

“This study suggests that, even for the very youngest premature babies, skin to skin contact can reduce the stress response.”

Article from logo1.gif